Keep knowledgeable with free updates
Merely signal as much as the Pensions trade myFT Digest — delivered on to your inbox.
Chancellor Rachel Reeves has proposed a serious overhaul of the pensions trade as the federal government hopes to drive funding into productive British property via a sequence of “megafunds”.
This could contain fast consolidation throughout UK outlined contribution office pensions — forecast to handle £800bn by 2030 — and native authorities pension schemes in England and Wales, that are on monitor to succeed in £500bn in measurement by the top of the last decade.
By forcing schemes to merge into funds with at the least £25bn in property, the federal government estimates it may possibly unlock as much as £80bn to put money into property with larger returns — similar to non-public fairness and infrastructure — and ship higher efficiency for savers.
How do the proposals have an effect on outlined contribution schemes?
The federal government is getting ready to set a minimal measurement of at the least £25bn for the outlined contribution office pension schemes that staff are robotically enrolled into, often known as default funds.
It is usually proposing to allow mergers with out consent from members of contract-based schemes, that are run by massive insurance coverage corporations and controlled by the Monetary Conduct Authority. This strategy was beforehand prevented as a result of contract schemes wouldn’t have trustees to advise whether or not a merger is in members’ pursuits.
The proposals would lead to a “a lot smaller” variety of multiemployer schemes in response to the federal government’s session paperwork, revealed on Thursday. There are at present about 30 authorised grasp trusts and 30 suppliers of contract-based schemes, with property of round £130bn and £350bn respectively final 12 months, in response to the federal government and New Monetary think-tank.
Contract-based schemes are likely to have decrease allocation in non-public markets similar to non-public fairness funds and infrastructure property than grasp trusts, which fall below the remit of the pensions regulator.
“The proposals are genuinely radical and would, over the course of this parliament, reshape UK office pensions,” mentioned Patrick Heath-Lay, chief government of grasp belief supplier Individuals’s Partnership. “The outcome could be a pointy consolidation of pensions provision creating fewer, a lot bigger suppliers.”
“It appears to be like like the federal government are lethal severe about intervening within the DC market to create megafunds,” mentioned Gregg McClymont, government director at IFM and a former Labour MP.
What do the reforms imply for native authorities pension schemes?
The federal government has proposed that 86 native councils throughout England and Wales hand over the administration of all £392bn of their mixed property to certainly one of eight swimming pools — or so-called megafunds — by March 2026.
This can speed up an current development. Councils already make investments a few of their funds via these swimming pools — by March this 12 months about 45 per cent of native authorities pension property have been invested by way of swimming pools’ sub-funds.
However the authorities has additionally set out guidelines for the way the swimming pools ought to function — requiring them to be funding administration corporations authorised and controlled by the Monetary Conduct Authority, with experience and capability to implement funding methods.
Native councils can have the selection whether or not or not they set an funding technique, however they are going to be required to “absolutely delegate” the implementation of this to the pool, and to take their principal recommendation from the pool.
“It’s nice that the chancellor has backed our argument for fewer, larger LGPS traders with the in-house experience to inject fairness into infrastructure and housing property,” mentioned Tracy Blackwell, chief funding officer of the Pensions Insurance coverage Company. “A rustic that wants extra infrastructure funding wants extra pure fairness sponsors for strategic infrastructure initiatives.”
Others are much less impressed. Quentin Marshall, chair of the Kensington and Chelsea council pension fund committee, which has been the most effective performing LGPS fund over the previous 5 years however has not pooled any of its property, mentioned: “I believe they [the government] will create massive bloated unaccountable quangos . . . which is able to ship worse returns at a better value.”
Robbie McInroy, head of native authorities pensions consulting at Hymans Robertson, welcomed higher pooling however mentioned March 2026 was an “overly formidable” timescale because it might add pointless prices.
He added that transferring oversight of legacy illiquid property from native councils to swimming pools “looks as if an enormous quantity of labor for the swimming pools and comparatively inefficient in comparison with simply letting them run-off inside the funds”.