Can we live on our planet without destroying it?

With eight billion individuals, we use lots of the Earth’s sources in methods which might be possible unsustainable. Klaus Hubacek, Professor of Science, Know-how and Society on the College of Groningen, the Netherlands, takes inventory of the scenario. How a lot land, water, and different sources does our life-style require? And the way can we adapt this life-style to remain inside the limits of what the Earth can provide? It’s attainable, Hubacek exhibits, however it can require insurance policies based mostly on scientific proof.

Our consumption patterns have an effect on the atmosphere, that a lot we all know. A transparent instance is the focus of carbon dioxide within the ambiance. It has been rising at an more and more sooner fee for the reason that Sixties, leading to international warming, together with all its dire penalties. There’s a restrict to the quantity of consumption the Earth can help, and in 2009, scientists outlined 9 ‘planetary boundaries’ as indicators of when we have now reached that restrict. Crossing them might result in irreversible harm to the Earth’s stability and resilience. These planetary boundaries embody indicators corresponding to ocean acidification and the worldwide use of recent water. In 2023, six of those planetary boundaries had already been crossed.

Hubacek has devoted his tutorial profession to learning how humanity is performing when it comes to these planetary boundaries, and what wants to alter to forestall us from crossing them even additional. In accordance with him, ‘the essential calculation is: given a sure variety of individuals on the planet and the planetary boundaries, how a lot can we eat to remain inside these limits?’.

The divide between wealthy and poor

In the mean time, the richest one per cent of the world’s inhabitants produces 50 occasions extra greenhouse gasses than the 4 billion individuals within the backside 50 per cent. The divide between the wealthy and the poor on this planet is a typical thread in Hubacek’s work. He is likely one of the authors of a paper, revealed within the journal Nature on 13 November, that describes this challenge. Utilizing an in depth dataset protecting as much as 201 consumption teams throughout 168 international locations, the paper analyses the affect of spending patterns on six key environmental indicators.

The evaluation reveals how totally different shopper behaviours contribute to planetary transgressions, and concludes that if the world’s prime 20 per cent of shoppers shifted their consumption habits towards extra sustainable patterns discovered inside their group, they may cut back their environmental affect by 25 to 53 per cent. The research additionally exhibits that altering consumption patterns in simply the meals and companies sectors may assist carry vital planetary boundaries again inside secure limits.

Altering our life-style to remain inside the boundaries

In earlier papers, Hubacek researched particular options that would assist us steadiness our lives to higher cope with the planetary boundaries. In a research revealed final August, he confirmed that if a food regimen with much less purple meat and extra legumes and nuts was adopted by the richest a part of the world, food-driven emissions would fall by 17 per cent, even when the inhabitants of poorer nations improve their meat consumption.

And simply final month, Hubacek co-authored a paper describing how the livestock sector is dangerously transgressing a number of of the planetary boundaries. The paper argues that any measures to counter this detrimental impact ought to be ‘region-specific’: ‘Clearly, there will likely be variations. A plant-based food regimen is just not appropriate for conventional Mongolian nomads, who rely on yaks and their milk.’

Hubacek retains pointing to options when he identifies transgressions of planetary boundaries. ‘Nevertheless, we should not focus a lot on creating new technical options, as there are already so many options which we do not implement,’ he argues. ‘And most governments subsidize dangerous behaviour.’ For instance, subsidies for fossil fuels globally are overcompensating for the mitigation impact that we obtain by means of carbon pricing corresponding to carbon taxes and carbon buying and selling schemes. ‘And there are additionally many inconsistent insurance policies, corresponding to stimulating the usage of warmth pumps and, on the identical time, elevating the worth of the electrical energy they use.’

It is attainable

What Hubacek exhibits is that not all hope is misplaced: humanity can keep inside the planetary boundaries. Nevertheless it appears that there’s little political will to sort out points corresponding to local weather change. Hubacek: ‘This worries me. And it causes actual concern within the youthful technology.’ Hubacek underlines that his science is just not activism-driven. ‘I am doing this work at the start due to my tutorial curiosity. However I additionally do not wish to waste my time on one thing that’s meaningless. What we’d like are evidence-based insurance policies.’

Peipei Tian, Honglin Zhong, Xiangjie Chen, Kuishuang Feng, Laixiang Solar, Ning Zhang, Xuan Shao, Yu Liu & Klaus Hubacek: Protecting the worldwide consumption inside the planetary boundaries. Nature, 13 November 2024.

Leave a Comment