Behind Closed Doors, Ukraine Anxiously Watched the US Election Unfold



Politics


/
November 7, 2024

Ukrainian officials maintain an optimistic, bipartisan approach to the US, but in private, many Ukrainians are pessimistic about an increasingly bleak war and the US role in it.

owV" alt="" class="wp-image-528574" srcset="owV 1440w, tHy 275w, RlG 768w, b4e 810w, Ecv 340w, ILE 168w, 8I5 382w, O7e 793w" sizes="(max-width: 1440px) 100vw, 1440px"/>

merican flags on a makeshift memorial honor Ukrainian Armed Forces soldiers killed in action on Independence Square in Kyiv, Ukraine, on November 5, 2024.

(Maxym Marusenko / NurPhoto via Getty Images)

In Lviv and Kyiv, the US election came with little fanfare. The bars didn’t play election coverage, and news outlets focused on the daily grind of war. But despite limited public celebration, behind closed doors, everyone was watching.

There are many reasons for Ukrainians to be nervous about how a Trump presidency might affect their war against Russia. There’s Trump’s friendliness with Russian President Vladimir Putin, his withholding military aid to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in exchange for political favors, or his general isolationist agenda and criticism of defense alliances like NATO. There’s also Trump’s vice-presidential pick JD Vance, who has been vocal and active against sending aid to Ukraine. Vance led the Republican coalition in Congress to block aid packages to Ukraine in April and has said on numerous occasions that a peace plan would involve Ukraine ceding its lost territory and giving up on its plans to join NATO, which is the plan that Putin also has suggested. Harris, meanwhile, promised to continue substantial aid to Ukraine.

Trump has repeatedly sidestepped questions regarding his response to the war in Ukraine other than to say that he would “end the war in a day”—that would likely mean pressuring Ukraine into accepting the loss of its territory and abandoning its plans to join NATO. Still, many in Ukraine have been disappointed that the $106 billion that the US has spent on aid to Ukraine has not been enough to fundamentally change the war. Many Ukrainians feel that the Democrats are hindering the overall war effort. This sentiment is fueled by President Joe Biden’s discouragement of airstrikes deep into Russian territory and his refusal to close Ukrainian airspace with NATO’s assistance, due to concerns about escalation.

In the morning before the election, an editorial from The Kyiv Independent implored American voters to consider Ukrainians as they went to the polls, but did not say which of the two candidates would most benefit Ukrainians. One Ukrainian friend explained that election-night watching, even for Ukrainian politicians, is not part of the culture, because politics has been corrupt or under a single party system for decades.

Current Issue

9or" alt="Cover of November 2024 Issue"/>

The media centers that at the beginning of the war that were gathering spots for foreign and Ukrainian journalists have withered or have disappeared as foreign journalists have stopped coming to Ukraine. But there are still cultural outposts for American cultural interests, like America House in central Lviv.  On the second floor of a historic building, there were no events directly related to the election, but it was hosting a English-language speaking club that evening.

At around 6 PM—or 11 AM EST, still many hours before polls would close, Glenn Anderson arrived wearing a Harris-Walz 2024 shirt. A former high-school history teacher in Orlando, Florida, Anderson had moved to Ukraine some eight years ago when he joined the Peace Corps and then was offered a job at Lviv Polytechnic University.

His students began to file in to the “oval office,” a curved room with windows overlooking Lviv’s streets, the election talk began. When discussion turned to Harris being the only hopeful option for Ukraine’s future, Inesa Horaschak from nearby Ivano Frankivsk who commuted to the class via a carsharing service said, “I read that if Trump wins, he will end the war quickly, and maybe that is good.”

“No, we can’t think that way,” Anderson said. “Ending the war will only mean capitulation.”

Olgha Ivaschuk, a journalist living in Lviv but originally from the currently Russian occupied Donbass, interjected. “So many soldiers have been lost,” she said. “I do not believe Ukraine will win. Not the way we want.”

Much of the official messaging since the war began has been that Ukraine must—no, will—regain its territory, including Crimea. On my last reporting trip in Kyiv almost exactly a year ago, government radio programs were discussing the imminent seizure of Crimea, that Crimea would be taken within the next few weeks. That never happened and, by any reasonable measure, was never close to happening, but it nevertheless dominated official programming. Now close to three years on, reports of war fatigue have plagued the Ukrainian government. The military is struggling to find new conscripts, and a counterinsurgency fizzled out earlier this year.

As the pessimism grew in the room, Anderson asked, “Am I the only one at this table that believes in Ukrainian victory?”

Anastasiia Kuchma, from Lviv, said that Ukrainians are interested in the US election for how it will determine aid to Ukraine. She hoped that Harris would win, but explained that Ukrainians are frustrated by the Democratic Party. Under Barack Obama, Crimea was annexed, under Biden, the invasion began and has not ceased. “But we also know that Trump is not dependable,” she said. “He can say one thing and do another or do one thing and say another.”

A young man who gave his name as Ivan explained that people have been talking about the election, though they weren’t expecting to care this much when the war began. “In this country we have no politics because of the war,” he said. “At the beginning of the war, we had the thought that the US election was in three years, so we were pretty confident that the war would end by now and I feel quite sad that we are still in this difficult situation.”

Some view the way to Trump’s heart is with a classic pro-American pitch that pits Ukraine as a defense against the United States’s classic enemies. The morning that the results had come in, officials were already eager to display admiration for Trump—who is known to be most easily persuaded by flattery. On popular Ukrainian morning show Snidanok, former foreign affairs minister Dmytro Kuleba listed five positive lessons from Trump’s win, which included a message that Europe will now need to be more responsible for its own defense, which will open new pathways of cooperation for Ukraine across the EU.

This bipartisan approach has meant that some Ukrainian officials have been courting the Republicans long before the 2024 election. At his offices near the parliament, Maryan Zablotskyy, sent messages to US colleagues to push forward with a plan to build a Ronald Reagan statue. He says he wants it to be made from the melted metal of a destroyed Russian tank that attacked Kyiv. A member of the US-Ukraine working parliamentary group, Zablotskyy’s office has a framed photograph of Reagan, and next to it a photo depicting Félix Rodriguez holding a withered Che Guevara captive, just an hour before Rodriguez assassinated him. The photograph was gifted to Zablotskyy by Rodriguez himself.

Zabloskyy talks about the conflict in the language of the Cold War. “It is a fact that we are not just fighting against Russia but also North Korea and Iran, and they are enemies of the United States” he said. “If you’re just being pro-American and you want to establish a balance of powers, you cannot allow this axis of evil win in Ukraine.” He saw no difference between Harris and Trump “in terms of Ukraine policy” in the lead-up to the election.

“There may have been more pro-Ukrainian comments from Democrats, but less pro-Ukrainian actions,” Zabloskyy said. “And there have been maybe not so loving comments from Republicans, but much more affirmative actions.” He cited Trump’s sanctions against the Nord Stream 2 pipeline, without mentioning that said pipeline was ushered into existence by Trump’s own first secretary of state Rex Tillerson in 2017, despite warnings from the previous Obama administration. He also cited that President Biden repealed the sanctions, also without mentioning that Trump had placed sanctions only after the project reached 90 percent completion during his presidency, which angered US allies in Europe and which Biden rolled back to rebuild the European relations that Trump had damaged.

But when it came to the idea of Trump pressuring Ukraine to meet Russia’s demands in a hypothetical peace deal, Zablotskyy was adamant. “When Russians say peace, they mean capitulation,” he said. “We are not going to accept that under any circumstances.”

Overall, Ukrainians are mostly eager to communicate that they are reluctant to give into despair. They are deeply invested in the US election, but not for one candidate over another—at least not publicly.

For Mariia Didkovska, a student at the National University in Kyiv and the project coordinator for the Institute of American Studies, an NGO and think tank founded in April 2023, the message is that Ukraine must be ready to explore all avenues possible to continue this increasingly bleak war. There is little room for hopelessness.

“We need a two-party approach, that things are not black and white,” she said. To explain this relentless optimism, she explained that on Sunday a rocket launched by Russia blew out the windows of her department, the Institute of International Relations and Journalism. She and other students came to help clean the glass. “Our faculty has told us to be positive, and that we will continue our studies. Because they know that we will need educated people, no matter what happens here,” she said.

“To be optimistic is our only way to survive.”

We can not back down

We now confront a second Trump presidency.

There’s not a moment to lose. We must harness our fears, our grief, and yes, our anger, to resist the dangerous policies Donald Trump will unleash on our country. We rededicate ourselves to our role as journalists and writers of principle and conscience.

Today, we also steel ourselves for the fight ahead. It will demand a fearless spirit, an informed mind, wise analysis, and humane resistance. We face the enactment of Project 2025, a far-right supreme court, political authoritarianism, increasing inequality and record homelessness, a looming climate crisis, and conflicts abroad. The Nation will expose and propose, nurture investigative reporting, and stand together as a community to keep hope and possibility alive. The Nation’s work will continue—as it has in good and not-so-good times—to develop alternative ideas and visions, to deepen our mission of truth-telling and deep reporting, and to further solidarity in a nation divided.

Armed with a remarkable 160 years of bold, independent journalism, our mandate today remains the same as when abolitionists first founded The Nation—to uphold the principles of democracy and freedom, serve as a beacon through the darkest days of resistance, and to envision and struggle for a brighter future.

The day is dark, the forces arrayed are tenacious, but as the late Nation editorial board member Toni Morrison wrote “No! This is precisely the time when artists go to work. There is no time for despair, no place for self-pity, no need for silence, no room for fear. We speak, we write, we do language. That is how civilizations heal.”

I urge you to stand with The Nation and donate today.

Onwards,

Katrina vanden Heuvel
Editorial Director and Publisher, The Nation

Carol Schaeffer

CUe" class="article-end__author-twitter" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">
zBY" width="17" height="14" viewbox="0 0 17 14" fill="none">

Carol Schaeffer is a journalist based in New York. She was a 2019–20 Fulbright Scholar in Berlin, Germany, where she reported on the far right. She has written for Smithsonian Magazine, ProPublica, The Atlantic, and other publications.

More from The Nation

KTF 1440w, k8D 275w, hmd 768w, HYQ 810w, CLE 340w, 1ny 168w, 2e1 382w, 0Ns 793w" src="KTF" alt="How We Can Defend Ourselves in the New Trump Era"/>

The labor organizer Bill Fletcher says that, to protect our constitutional democracy, “the union movement needs to become an anti-fascist movement.”

Q&A

/

Dave Zirin

UdO 1440w, KkZ 275w, jOX 768w, XUI 810w, LHa 340w, x8d 168w, QzY 382w, ZGA 793w" src="UdO" alt="Donald Trump speaks during a campaign rally at Van Andel Arena on November 5, 2024, in Grand Rapids, Michigan."/>

The United States chose Donald Trump in all his ugliness and cruelty, and the country will get what it deserves.

Elie Mystal

raj 1440w, Det 275w, 0ZY 768w, ldC 810w, aL3 340w, cNq 168w, X6D 382w, pXA 793w" src="raj" alt="Vice President Kamala Harris onstage at Howard University."/>

Consider how resoundingly she succeeded in her 107-day campaign—and what that means about how deep the problems are that we need to solve.

Joan Walsh

hrd 1440w, g9c 275w, 1Wg 768w, POF 810w, ciy 340w, 0Dh 168w, v4k 382w, bQj 793w" src="hrd" alt="Hakeem Jeffries, a Democrat from New York, left, and US House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Republican from Louisiana, right, during an unveiling ceremony in Emancipation Hall at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, US, on Tuesday, Sept. 24, 2024."/>

Republicans grabbed the Senate, but Democrats could still take the House—and no matter what happens, they have a duty to fight Trump with everything they have.

John Nichols

Y2o 1440w, e35 275w, L92 768w, fsT 810w, 3jn 340w, LM3 168w, 7UX 382w, yxZ 793w" src="Y2o" alt="President Joe Biden and US Vice President Kamala Harris attend an event on gun violence in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on September 26, 2024."/>

The lesson from 2024 is clear: If voters don’t see you as an agent of transformational change, they will turn to someone like Donald Trump.

Waleed Shahid


Leave a Comment